Word as Record or Invitation

We treat words primarily as records in need of interpretation, neglecting all too often a rather different approach, deeply rooted in biblical language that proclaims words as an act inviting participation.  Werner Kelber, The Oral and the Written Gospel

I find this to be an intriguing description of an essential difference between oral cultures and written/print cultures. It is difficult to take speech acts and discussion as "records" of fact or reality. They are ephemeral and insubstantial, and always dependent on memory for their survival. And so cannot be taken as dependable records. Their value and impact are almost exclusively realized within the present moment. They demand immediate and local engagement before that moment passes. 

In the modern world, we perceive written text as much more substantial and stable. It waits there inactive before us, inviting reflection, interpretation and again more interpretation.

It is possible to pass judgment as to which approach to words is better or more useful. My concern is more to come to an appreciation of the differences between oral and written text. And to appreciate the relative values of each.